
The RFL and Rugby League Cares have released a statement to clarify the situation surrounding the Rugby League Players Association.
Reports emerged earlier this week that funding for the players union, which is a part of the GMB, had been pulled by the governing body. The organisation exists in order to provides support and guidance to players, both current and past, coaches and support staff, who may need it .
As such, the union, which has been led by former Hull FC and Warrington Wolves forward Garreth Carvell, has played an important role over the years in ensuring that players get what they are owed, with their involvement in the Toronto Wolfpack situation a shining example of their work.
However, Carvell’s role was funded by the RFL, via Rugby League Cares, and that funding has now been lost. It comes during uncertain times at Salford Red Devils, with those players now without proper representation.
With that in mind, the governing body has issued a statement to explain the funding pull, with a lack of trust from players within the game being cited.
RFL statement
The statement read: “The RFL and Rugby League Cares would like to clarify the circumstances regarding the two organisations’ involvement in funding a position with the GMB Union to represent the interests of Rugby League players.
“The role of Rugby League Players Association Convener was created in 2021 because the RFL recognised the need for the interests of players to be represented by a dedicated Association or union.
“The RFL agreed to provide the funding to employ the post holder for a three-year period, during which time the post holder would work with the GMB on recruitment, retention, organisation and representation of GMB members employed by professional clubs, including Women’s Super League.
“The post holder was supervised and managed by the GMB Regional Organiser and Senior Organiser for West Yorkshire and was expected to represent union members as individuals and collectively in negotiations and procedures, as well as act as the point of contact for the RFL to liaise with on items relating to the RFLs’ Regulatory Framework.
“During this period of significant investment by the RFL, it was apparent that the Rugby League playing community were not aligned on how best to represent their interests and did not join the union as members. Consequently, and due to increasing budgetary pressures, the RFL took the decision not to extend the funding arrangement at the end of the three-year period in November 2024.
“RL Cares then agreed to fund the role for a further six months until May 2025, pursuant to the GMB providing sufficient evidence that they could win the trust of players, which would be evidenced by strong recruitment, unfortunately this positive recruitment does not appear to have materialised.
“RFL Chief Executive Tony Sutton said: “The RFL still believes that it is in the best interests of the players – and indeed the wider sport – that they are represented by an effective and independent players’ association.
““The RFL will continue to work with RL Cares, the players and others to find a way forward by which a trusted Players Association can emerge to successfully represent the playing community.
““The RFL also remains committed to maintaining its arrangement with RL Cares as the sport’s recognised Player Wellbeing Provider. As an independent charity, and with its proven track record in delivering world-class player welfare programmes, RL Cares is well equipped to fulfil this important role.”
“RL Cares Chief Executive Chris Rostron said: “From our daily conversations with players it is clear that there remains a desire for their interests to be represented by an effective, organised Players Association.
““In spite of a considerable investment by ourselves and the RFL over the last three and a half years, we have yet to see any evidence that the GMB has been able to convert the players’ wishes into membership of the union.
““Having an effective voice and playing an active role in the sport is not only good for the players’ wellbeing, but ultimately good for the sport. This can only come through a majority of players being represented and engaged.””

Eric T Cat
July 2, 2025 at 11:22 am
When things go horribly wrong, as is inevitable , players will expect someone to be doing something to resolve matters, from clubs collapsing leaving players without owed wages, broken contracts, and no jobs, through to claims for life altering/ending injuries sustained in their careers, leaving behind young families struggling to cope with little or no support. Coping with life after fame, dealing with mental health issues, finding workl, just having someone there to talk with. They will want someone to speak out if owners decide to go the Union/Football route and expect players to play 50/60 games all year across multiple competitions with no breaks. Having a professional body that represents the interests of players collectively, and individually, is core to the progress of the sport. But there is a financial cost, they have to pay their dues to benefit. Working with the Trade Union movement is a no brainer, over a century of organised work, stronger together. It is only fair that the RFL, and clubs, pay towards this support, they have a duty of care, and finding allows them to ensure it’s independent, fair, and equitable. When everything is goung fine it’s easy to decide you don’t need such support, but life is fragile, it does not take much to push you into dire circumstances. Sadly players seem not to be grasping that concept. If they won’t do it voluntarily maybe it should be forced on them? It is a requirement to be a member, they can elect not to pay their dues political levy, my own Union membership was conditional on that, my father was one of those who won the right in court over it.
There needs to be some harsh discussion, lay out the issues to players, explain the reasons for the need for a strong body to represent their collective interests. For what it will cost them the benefits far outweigh them!